For the second time since the trial of Elizabeth Holmes started, the jury heard testimony Tuesday that Theranos Inc. altered a doc to point out traders that its expertise had been validated by a serious pharmaceutical firm.
Constance Cullen, an immunology knowledgeable who helped lead take a look at improvement at pharmaceutical agency Schering-Plough Corp. , testified that she had been unimpressed with Theranos and located Ms. Holmes “cagey” throughout her technique of evaluating the startup’s expertise for a potential partnership. Regardless of that, prosecutors say, Theranos put Schering-Plough’s emblem on a doc it later gave to a potential enterprise associate and investor, purporting that the pharmaceutical firm had checked out and validated its blood-testing gadgets.
